I love your your use of the Royal 'we', ckeskin! In this case 'we' is @Melbourne12.
Are you getting these late suggestions, John?
For everyone's info, I already have the April Poll list from Melbourne12, pending the price for one about to be released item.
....
Are you getting these late suggestions, John?
For everyone's info, I already have the April Poll list from Melbourne12, pending the price for one about to be released item.
The British Queen Victoria used it, as in, "We are not amused", which meant someone had better fix the cause of her discontent. I guess it now means, "I can see what needs to be done but I'm not doing it". The Royal "We" can be used very amusingly, as you managed, or can be snobbish. or this or that - it's very flexible but to be used sparingly. Never include a woman in a Royal "We"!English is not my first language. Does it sound a bit snobbish when I say that? I was just trying to refer all of us as a community.
The British Queen Victoria used it, as in, "We are not amused", which meant someone had better fix the cause of her discontent. I guess it now means, "I can see what needs to be done but I'm not doing it". The Royal "We" can be used very amusingly, as you managed, or can be snobbish. or this or that - it's very flexible but to be used sparingly. Never include a woman in a Royal "We"!