Tattoo's

soapalchemist said:
O.K. Mirabelle, you made me Google that. But let's face it. Bonanza was never as good as The Virginian.
And no. It was 'Glastonbury 1984, and still can't get ....'

Are you encouraging others to guess? I would hope the answer's yes.
 
Well I have read all the posts and you can call me 'oldfashioned' BUT tattoos on a guy, provided they are not all over the face neck and bald head seem quite acceptable if thats what turns you on.
BUT when I see the all too present trend of 'women' rather than 'Ladies' with tattoos, especially in quite visible parts of their bodies, to me it just indicates, 'low-grades'!
It just seems so wrong and 'the fairer' sex spend such a lot of money on their appearance but ruin it with a permanent 'badge' of 'look at me, I am so trendy with my tramp-stamp'!
Of course they will also quite wrongly term themselves 'ladies'. Oh Boy! I must be old-fashioned but standards is what I am about, & yes I have 2 tattoos which are hidden and which I got in 1957.
 
JohnnyO said:
wanna lose the hounds

Oh yes, I seen what you did Dodgemeister, I so surely did !

JohnnyO. \:icon_razz:

Hey Johnny, what's doin buddy,

Glad you caught that. I always said you're one of the smarter members here, Heh, talk about damning with faint praise.......

Thanks for the post,

Dodgy
 
Back
Top Bottom