- Messages
- 67
You should watch his review of the Rocnel. He calls it " the most dangerous f#%#ing razor in the world" a real nut!
Reviewers
- Thread starter Redfisher
- Start Date
- Messages
- 5,893
- Location
- Rebublic of Scotland
- Messages
- 247
Nuts or not, he's the most entertaining wet shaving reviewer on YouTube.
And right or wrong, the man is honest in his opinions.
- Messages
- 247
Yeah well, I wouldn't vote for him to lead a country, but that doesn't mean he doesn't know how to shave... While giving me a giggle or two in the process.
- Messages
- 669
- Location
- Adelaide, Australia
Nuts or not, he's the most entertaining wet shaving reviewer on YouTube.
The problem is his "honesty" changes 180 degrees...
He called Wolfman names, over/inflated priced, BS about shipping charges and I quote here "Wolfman can eat my Parker 26C ass" and "ATT are well worth the money"
His posts are still there for every one to see and I am more than happy to provide links
Next thing you know, he finally receives his Wolfman and makes a video, that it is the greatest razor on the planet (but blocks of course coments).
And now he tells every one who cares to listen, that ATT are using cheap steel...
As much as I hate fanboyism - I hate it even more, when guys like him try to destroy other peoples livelihood with poor reviews.
So either he loves a product, or he tries to destroy it - in both cases the last person whose reviews I would trust.
- Messages
- 247
Well, is it possible that someone could think that Wolfman has over-inflated prices and delivers a great shave?
Is it possible that someone could think that ATT is worth the money, but should use a higher grade steel for the price you are paying?
Not everything is black and white here. You could have negative opinions about some aspects of a product or company while other aspects are positive. And, you could have negative opinions about a product before you tried it, and then have your mind changed after you own it and have experience with it.
I'm not sure which it is with this guy. You may be right that he is unfairly demonizing products, but before I pass judgment on him, I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt and offer alternative possibilities.
- Messages
- 6,401
- Location
- California
- Messages
- 669
- Location
- Adelaide, Australia
Sorry, if I didn't make myself clear: he BASHED (in a truly rude way) Wolfman, before trying one. For me, that is a absolute no, no. He went on to say, James over inflates shipping costs - and stood by it, even after me showing a shipping label and proving that James actually doesn't charge the full amount for shipping (he gives you a discount).
I have no issues, with somebody saying a product is too expensive for them - I have my own limits. There are many products I find to be overpriced.
But saying: "Wolfman can eat my Parker 26C ass" - that is just rude. Having not tried one and saying that: that is just pure stupidity.
Passing negative judgement on the quality of a product without trying it: envy
Saying one day how great a product is and bashing it after some time: at a minimum not very thoughtful, or irrational...
Now you can choose to give him the benefit of a doubt - I personally don't doubt, that his reviews are worthless...