JohnVaux said:NTS, I have Supermax super platinums on route to me.. would you like to test these for the spreadsheet ?
Confused. Line#116 on your spreadsheet shows the image of the super platinums but the info from the normal platinums.NotTheStig said:Hi and thanks for your offer. I would be happy to give them a try and score. Thanks for the offer. Pm sent.
Mr_Smartepants said:JohnVaux said:NTS, I have Supermax super platinums on route to me.. would you like to test these for the spreadsheet ?
Confused. Line#116 on your spreadsheet shows the image of the super platinums but the info from the normal platinums.NotTheStig said:Hi and thanks for your offer. I would be happy to give them a try and score. Thanks for the offer. Pm sent.
Dave Q said:Are these Personna Blues? if they are, they are reasonably cheap.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/100-Pack-Personna-Stainless-Steel-Double-Edge-Safety-Barber-Shaving-Razor-Blades-/331157533311?pt=US_Shaving_Hair_Removal&hash=item4d1a86f27f
NotTheStig said:I'm thinking of removing the pricing column from my spreadsheet. My thinking is the 'bargain or not' factor shouldn't keep a relatively average blade with an artificially high score, or hold back great blades which can be pricey (or not!). I think it might be better to just judge the blade on whether it's good or not, and not let wildly fluctuating prices factor into it at all.
When I started this I never thought so many blades would vary in price so much over time or indeed that the table would be used so much by so many for so long. I'll see what people think (if they post their comments here) and make a decision next week. If I did remove the column the scores would all drop and I'd have to re-think the colour bandings for the score totals accordingly.